ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Virtual Pedagogical Agents and Instructional Content Type on Learners' Experience in Online Learning: Evidence from Behavioral, Eye-Tracking, and EEG Data.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Online learning has become an important means of acquiring knowledge. Virtual pedagogical agents have gradually evolved from auxiliary tools into intelligent instructional media capable of affective interaction. However, how these agents affect learning outcomes remains unclear. Integrating social agency theory and cognitive load theory, this study developed a model in which virtual pedagogical agent type was the independent variable; learning experience was the dependent variable; psychological distance, emotional attachment, and attentional engagement were mediators; and instructional content type was the moderator. A 2 (virtual pedagogical agent: human-like vs. non-human) × 2 (instructional content type: traditional knowledge vs. interest-oriented popular science) mixed design was used. Questionnaires, eye tracking, and electroencephalography (EEG) were combined to assess the learning processes of 40 university students. The results showed that the interaction between agent type and instructional content type significantly affected learning experience. Specifically, in learning contexts featuring traditional knowledge content, human-like virtual agents were associated with higher learning satisfaction, greater emotional attachment, and lower psychological distance. In contrast, during interest-oriented content learning, non-human agents achieved superior knowledge recall scores, along with higher learning satisfaction, stronger emotional attachment, and lower psychological distance. Furthermore, eye-tracking data showed that attentional allocation was also affected by this combination. EEG data showed that FCz spectral power varied with it as well, however, because power rose simultaneously in theta, alpha, beta, and gamma; this broadband pattern is not an unambiguous index of deeper processing and may partly reflect a general increase in signal amplitude. In addition, the moderated-mediation analysis revealed that psychological distance and emotional attachment mediated the relationship between virtual-agent type and learning experience, while knowledge type moderated these mediating paths. The practical implications for online learning are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.