Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792489›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Body-Shape Concerns, Eating Regulation, and Mediterranean Diet Adherence in a Romanian Convenience Sample: A Cross-Sectional Self-Determination Theory Perspective.

Cristina Georgescu, Cristina Filip, Ada Moldovan, Florina Daniela Ruta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristina GeorgescuNutrition and Dietetics Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.ORCID 0009-0002-2725-5508
Cristina FilipDepartment of Biochemistry and Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Ada MoldovanNutrition and Dietetics Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Florina Daniela RutaDepartment of Community Nutrition and Food Safety, Faculty of Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5715-5220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autonomous motivation may support healthy eating, whereas body-shape concerns may fuel controlled eating regulation; the two had not been examined jointly with Mediterranean diet adherence in Romanian adults. In this cross-sectional study, a convenience sample of 224 predominantly female (87.1%), university-educated Romanian adults completed the Body Shape Questionnaire-16B (BSQ-16B), the Regulation of Eating Behaviors Scale (REBS), and a Romanian-adapted 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS). The theory-derived expectations were not preregistered. Fit of the six-factor REBS structure improved substantially when cross-loadings between adjacent regulations were allowed, though discriminant validity remained limited; a bifactor analysis supported the BSQ-16B total score. BSQ-16B scores were associated with introjected (β = 0.65) and controlled regulation (β = 0.54) but not with autonomous styles or adherence (ρ = -0.03). Autonomous motivation was associated with adherence after adjustment (b = 0.63 points per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.94), as was physical activity; in an exploratory subscale model, integrated regulation showed the strongest unique association. Body-shape concerns were coupled with internal pressure but showed little evidence of an association with MEDAS-assessed adherence, whereas autonomous regulation emerged as a relevant correlate. The findings are consistent with, but do not test, autonomy-supportive counseling.

Indexed as

adultsautonomous motivationbody imagebody shape concernscontrolled motivationeating regulationMEDASMediterranean dietRomaniaself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID42792489
PMCPMC13603406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.