ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Body-Shape Concerns, Eating Regulation, and Mediterranean Diet Adherence in a Romanian Convenience Sample: A Cross-Sectional Self-Determination Theory Perspective.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autonomous motivation may support healthy eating, whereas body-shape concerns may fuel controlled eating regulation; the two had not been examined jointly with Mediterranean diet adherence in Romanian adults. In this cross-sectional study, a convenience sample of 224 predominantly female (87.1%), university-educated Romanian adults completed the Body Shape Questionnaire-16B (BSQ-16B), the Regulation of Eating Behaviors Scale (REBS), and a Romanian-adapted 14-item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS). The theory-derived expectations were not preregistered. Fit of the six-factor REBS structure improved substantially when cross-loadings between adjacent regulations were allowed, though discriminant validity remained limited; a bifactor analysis supported the BSQ-16B total score. BSQ-16B scores were associated with introjected (β = 0.65) and controlled regulation (β = 0.54) but not with autonomous styles or adherence (ρ = -0.03). Autonomous motivation was associated with adherence after adjustment (b = 0.63 points per standard deviation; 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.94), as was physical activity; in an exploratory subscale model, integrated regulation showed the strongest unique association. Body-shape concerns were coupled with internal pressure but showed little evidence of an association with MEDAS-assessed adherence, whereas autonomous regulation emerged as a relevant correlate. The findings are consistent with, but do not test, autonomy-supportive counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.