ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Algorithmic Gamification and Gig Workers' Proactive Service Behaviour: An Attribution Theory Perspective.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Algorithmic gamification has become an important tool for gig platforms to shape labour input; however, its relationship with the proactive service behaviour of gig workers remains unclear. Drawing on attribution theory, this study developed a dual-path model linking algorithmic gamification to gig workers' proactive service behaviour through commitment attribution and control attribution, with algorithmic procedural fairness as a boundary condition. The results indicate that algorithmic gamification is positively associated with proactive service behaviour through commitment attribution and negatively associated with it through control attribution. Further analyses revealed that the indirect effect through commitment attribution was larger in absolute magnitude than that through control attribution, yielding a statistically significant positive total indirect effect. Moreover, algorithmic procedural fairness strengthens the positive association between algorithmic gamification and commitment attribution and attenuates its positive association with control attribution. At high levels of algorithmic procedural fairness, the conditional indirect effect of control attribution was not statistically significant. By examining workers' attributions of platform intent, this study identifies two mechanisms linking algorithmic gamification to extra-role service behaviour and offers managerial implications for the design of algorithmic gamification on gig platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.