Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792424›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Proactive Control in Bilingual Language Switching: Evidence from Cue-Based Preparation in Croatian-German Children.

Emily Lončarek, Maki Kubota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily LončarekDepartment of Linguistic, Literary and Aesthetic Studies, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
Maki KubotaDepartment of Linguistic, Literary and Aesthetic Studies, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0580-1045

Funding

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship 101110564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates a previously unexplored aspect of bilingual language control in young children: the ability to engage proactive control mechanisms during language switching. Using a novel cued language-switching paradigm, we examined whether Croatian-German bilingual children aged 4-11 can utilize advance preparation time to facilitate language switching, and whether this ability varies with age. Thirty-nine bilingual children completed a picture-naming task in which a language cue (flag) either appeared simultaneously with the target picture (no preparation) or preceded it by a brief interval (preparation possible). Results revealed a significant cue benefit, with children responding faster when given advance preparation time. This benefit was present across the sampled age range and was observed in every child who completed both cue conditions, suggesting that even the youngest children in our sample (4-6 years; n = 7) were able to use anticipatory information to prepare their responses. Additionally, we observed reliable switch costs (switch > stay) that did not differ detectably by target language or language dominance, alongside mixing costs that were modulated by group, a pattern partly attributable to baseline naming differences. These findings provide preliminary evidence that anticipatory preparation processes in bilingual language switching may emerge early in development. The results have important implications for understanding the interplay between bilingual experience, cognitive development, and the emergence of anticipatory control mechanisms in childhood.

Indexed as

bilingual language controlchildrencognitive developmentlanguage switchingpreparation timeproactive control

Identifiers

PMID42792424
PMCPMC13603835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.