Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792410›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Volunteering Predicts Mixed Outcomes on Subjective Wellbeing.

Helen Keyes, Sarah Gradidge, Caoimhe Ryan, Eimear Mary Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen KeyesSchool of Psychology, Sport and Sensory Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7654-3181
Sarah GradidgeSchool of Psychology, Sport and Sensory Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7827-5408
Caoimhe RyanDepartment of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Eimear Mary LeeSchool of Psychology, Sport and Sensory Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3780-1843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored whether engaging in volunteering predicted subjective wellbeing and loneliness, above and beyond known sociodemographic predictors. Secondary data from 7146 adults from the Taking Part 2019-2020 survey (UK household survey of participation in culture and sport) were analysed. Hierarchical regressions were used to explore whether engaging in volunteering (yes/no) predicts subjective wellbeing variables (a sense that life is worthwhile, happiness, life satisfaction and anxiety) and loneliness. Gender, age group, Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), health and employment status were included as covariates. Volunteering significantly and positively predicted a sense that life is worthwhile, although with small variance explained, and was also unexpectedly associated with greater anxiety. These relationships were observed above and beyond the variance explained by the known sociodemographic predictors. Our study provides some support for the idea that volunteering may be linked to greater wellbeing, in terms of life being worthwhile, but offers a note of caution about the potential negative relationship with anxiety. Based on our findings, we suggest that volunteering is not necessarily linked to greater hedonic wellbeing but may instead be linked to greater eudaimonic wellbeing, that is, a sense that life is worthwhile.

Indexed as

lonelinesssubjective wellbeingvolunteering

Identifiers

PMID42792410
PMCPMC13603460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.