ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Iterative Refinement of a Sensory-Based Mindfulness Coaching Approach: An Exploratory Qualitative Action Research Study with Korean University Students.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This exploratory qualitative action research study examined the implementation and iterative refinement of mindfulness-flow-awareness-coaching (MFAC), a sensory-based mindfulness coaching approach, and explored participants' reported experiences. Six Korean university students completed pre-MFAC and post-MFAC interviews and the six-session MFAC framework. One participant's initial Session 4 was discontinued after an unexpected recollection resulted in emotional overwhelm, and an adjusted Session 4 was conducted one week later, resulting in 37 session deliveries. The study drew on interview and session transcripts, participant records, action records, and observational and reflexive notes. The first author conducted a chronological implementation analysis and reflexive thematic analysis, which identified four practice-based principles: prioritising sensory noticing over interpretation, establishing psychological safety before task completion, balancing structural consistency with responsive adaptation, and framing action-oriented activities as revisable attempts. Three themes characterised participants' reported experiences: greater openness to sensory and emotional experience, contextualised self-understanding through meaning-making, and movement towards feasible action. Participants also reported discomfort, interruptions, ambiguous experiences, and incomplete actions. These findings offer a contextually grounded account of how we refined MFAC and how participants interpreted their engagement. This study positions MFAC as a practice-informed approach rather than as evidence of therapeutic efficacy or causal psychological change. Future research employing diverse methodologies should examine its applicability and transferability to broader populations and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.