Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792372›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Traumatic Bereavement Among Incarcerated Women: Understanding and Responding to Complex Grief After the Death of a Child.

Catherine Gallagher, Nena P Messina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine GallagherCriminology, Law and Society, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.
Nena P MessinaEnvisioning Justice Solutions, Simi Valley, CA 93065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6817-829X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incarcerated women face elevated suicide risk at the intersection of chronic loss, cumulative trauma, and constrained environments. In prison, the death of a child constitutes a profound and overlooked traumatic bereavement. This conceptual manuscript examines how carceral environments restrict privacy, autonomy, family contact, mourning rituals, and social and clinical support, thereby adversely reshaping grief. The Dual Process Model of Coping and meaning-making frameworks are integrated to explain how incarceration may constrain oscillation between loss-oriented and restoration-oriented coping. Institutional functioning may resemble restoration-oriented behavior while lacking critical adaptive factors that define restorative coping. Restricted information, exclusion from rituals and relational validation, and punishment for grief-related behavior may obstruct narrative reconstruction, continuing bonds, and maternal identity reorganization. The model further considers how acute grief interacts with chronic stress, sustained threat responsivity, sleep disruption, and cumulative allostatic burden to intensify psychological and somatic distress without assuming a uniform neurobiological pathway. Social determinants of health, histories of victimization, substance use, and facility-level conditions are important sources of variation. Protective pathways are also specified, including family connection, peer support, cultural and spiritual practices, and clinical care. The paper concludes with testable propositions, a research agenda, and a framework for notification, stabilization, and continuing bereavement support.

Indexed as

child deathcorrectional mental healthincarcerated womenmaternal griefmeaning-makingresiliencesocial determinants of healthsubstance usetraumatic bereavement

Identifiers

PMID42792372
PMCPMC13603232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.