Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792347›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Asymmetrical Effects of Language Mixing in Bilingual Children's Word Learning.

Minjeong Kang, Youngon Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minjeong KangDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-5121-9705
Youngon ChoiDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0698-1511

Funding

Chung-Ang UniversityNational Research Foundation of Korea RS-2025-00513582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language mixing is a common feature of bilingual environments, yet its effects on bilingual children's word learning remain inconsistent across studies. The present study examined how language mixing affects novel word learning in 3- to 4-year-old Korean-English bilinguals, extending previous work to an understudied language pair with a greater language distance than those studied previously. Following an established experimental paradigm, children were taught novel words embedded in either single-language or mixed-language sentences during a looking-while-listening task. For half the children, carrier sentences introduced the novel words in their dominant language; for the other half, they were introduced in their non-dominant language. Overall, children successfully mapped the novel word to referents in the single-language context but showed difficulty doing so in the intra-sentence code-switched language context. However, learning patterns diverged by the dominance of the carrier language; when carrier phrases were presented in a non-dominant language, language mixing significantly affected children's novel word learning, supporting learning only in a single-language context. No difference in language mixing was observed when the carrier language was dominant. These findings partially replicate and extend prior work on the effects of language mixing on young bilingual learners' word learning, suggesting that the costs of language mixing vary across learning contexts, depending on the specific switching directionality between two distant languages.

Indexed as

bilingualismcode-switchinglanguage distancelanguage dominanceword learning

Identifiers

PMID42792347
PMCPMC13603895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.