ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Latent Profile Analysis of Resilience, Peer Victimization, and Friendship Quality Configurations Among Chinese Adolescents: Identifying Four Subgroups and Their Self-Injury Prevalence.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This cross-sectional study aimed to identify distinct subgroups of Chinese adolescents based on resilience, peer victimization, and friendship quality, as well as to describe self-injury prevalence across subgroups.
methodsA survey of 33,821 middle school students (mean age 14.3 years; 49.5% male) assessed resilience (RSCA), peer victimization (MPVS), friendship quality (FQQ), depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and psychological pain (TDPPS). Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified subgroups using 11 indicators; logistic regression examined self-injury associations.
resultsFour profiles emerged: High Resource-Low Victimization (85.3%), Moderate Resource-Moderate Victimization (7.6%), Moderate Resource-Polyvictimization (2.1%), and Moderate Resource-Verbal Victimization (5.0%). Self-injury prevalence differed significantly across groups (18.1%, 47.5%, 56.3%, and 44.8%;
conclusionHeterogeneous resource-victimization profiles exist among adolescents. Verbal victimization-despite its otherwise moderate resources-was associated with the highest adjusted odds of self-injury, challenging conventional victimization hierarchies. Causal inferences are precluded by the cross-sectional design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.