Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792290›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Differential Associations of Authoritarian Submission and Traditionalism with Fake-News Detection and Conspiracy-Claim Endorsement: Evidence from Two Romanian Samples in the 2024-2025 Electoral Cycle.

Teodor Răileanu-Olariu, Adriana Mutu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teodor Răileanu-OlariuFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași, 700554 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0009-0002-1561-5270
Adriana MutuDepartment of Humanities & Market Research, ESIC Business & Marketing School, 08021 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8290-5211

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Susceptibility to misinformation-related content threatens democratic processes, yet the roles of individual authoritarianism components remain understudied. We report two independent Romanian studies conducted during the 2024-2025 electoral cycle, examining associations of aggression, conventionalism/traditionalism, and submission/conservatism with two outcomes: accuracy in identifying false news (Study 1, N = 427, RWA-15) and endorsement of conspiracy claims drawn from Romanian electoral discourse (Study 2, N = 170, VSA-6). Adjusted regression models showed that authoritarian submission was the strongest negative correlate of false-news accuracy in Study 1 (β = -0.411,

Indexed as

conspiracy-claim endorsementconspiracy theoriesfake newsmedia literacymisinformationpresidential electionsright-wing authoritarianismRomaniasubmissiontraditionalism

Identifiers

PMID42792290
PMCPMC13603442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.