Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792037›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Postbiotics and Paraprobiotics as Next-Generation Gut Microbiome Modulators in Sustainable Aquaculture Health.

Nguyen Vu Linh, Luu Tang Phuc Khang, Patima Permpoonpattana, Nguyen Dinh-Hung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nguyen Vu LinhAquatic Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0812-4764
Luu Tang Phuc KhangAquatic Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8594-5083
Patima PermpoonpattanaDepartment of Agricultural Science and Technology, Faculty of Innovative Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Surat Thani 84000, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-7184
Nguyen Dinh-HungAquaculture Pathology Laboratory, School of Animal & Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-6265

Funding

Prince of Songkla University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread antibiotic use in aquaculture has increased selective pressure on resident bacterial communities, accelerating the emergence of resistance in key pathogens and raising concerns for animal health, environmental microbiomes, and food-chain safety. Reducing dependence on therapeutic antimicrobials requires alternative strategies that remain effective under the processing and biosafety constraints of intensive production systems, where recurrent bacterial diseases continue to cause substantial economic losses. Live probiotics, currently the most extensively studied microbiome-based intervention, have practical limitations, including reduced viability during feed pelleting and extrusion, transient gut colonization, strain-specific host responses, biosafety concerns related to horizontal transfer of antimicrobial-resistance genes, and variable regulatory requirements across regions. Postbiotics, defined as preparations of non-viable microbial biomass, with or without metabolites, that confer a demonstrated health benefit in the target host, and paraprobiotics, which emphasize inactivated whole-cell preparations that preserve surface-associated microbial molecular patterns, may help address several of these constraints. These approaches offer improved compositional definition, greater feed-processing stability, and a potentially more favorable biosafety profile. Because they are non-viable, their anti-pathogen effects do not depend on growth or competitive colonization but may instead involve preformed antimicrobial compounds retained in some preparations, interference with pathogen attachment, modulation of the intestinal environment, reinforcement of barrier function, and stimulation of host immune responses. This review synthesizes current evidence on postbiotics and paraprobiotics in aquaculture, with emphasis on structural classification, pattern-recognition receptor signaling, intestinal barrier function, innate immune priming, encapsulation technologies, and translational readiness. Taken together, available evidence supports postbiotics and paraprobiotics as promising, but not yet fully characterized, alternatives to live probiotics within antibiotic-reduction strategies for aquaculture. Progress toward commercial application will depend on resolving key questions related to dose-response relationships, processing stability in formulated feeds, and species-specific efficacy.

Indexed as

antibiotic alternativesaquafeedgut microbiomeinnate immune primingparaprobioticspostbiotics

Identifiers

PMID42792037
PMCPMC13603772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.