Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791992›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Fungal Identification and Empirical Antifungal Treatment in Critically Ill Patients with Secondary Peritonitis-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Patrícia Bernardo, Susana M Fernandes, Ana S Nepomuceno, Denise Pinto, João M Ribeiro, João Gouveia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrícia BernardoClínica Universitária de Medicina Intensiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-8994
Susana M FernandesClínica Universitária de Medicina Intensiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7468-9141
Ana S NepomucenoClínica Universitária de Medicina Intensiva, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
Denise PintoServiço de Medicina Intensiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santa Maria, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.
João M RibeiroServiço de Medicina Intensiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santa Maria, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-8948
João GouveiaServiço de Medicina Intensiva, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santa Maria, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe clinical impact of empirical antifungal therapy in patients with secondary peritonitis and sepsis remains incompletely established. This study aimed to identify risk factors for fungal infection in this population and the impact of empirical antifungal therapy on clinical outcomes.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients who underwent abdominal surgery for visceral lesions. Demographic and microbiological data were extracted from electronic health records.

resultsA total of 411 patients, 56.9% male and with an average age of 68.8 ± 15.8 years, admitted following urgent gastrointestinal surgery were included. Fungi were isolated from peritoneal fluid or blood in 13.9% of patients during their ICU stay, with a median hospital length of stay until identification of 10 days (interquartile range 1-19 days).

conclusionsThe mortality impact of fungal isolation remains uncertain. Our results suggest that routine empirical antifungal therapy should be approached with caution, prioritizing targeted therapy for patients with confirmed positive cultures or a persistent, refractory clinical course despite adequate source control. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in future prospective studies before informing changes in clinical practice.

Indexed as

antifungal treatmentCandida peritonitisintra-abdominal candidiasissecondary peritonitissepsis

Identifiers

PMID42791992
PMCPMC13603327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.