Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791945›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Integrating Predictive Analytics into Hospital Automation: Comparative Evaluation of Prediction Models for Patient Monitor Demand in Operating Rooms.

Shaohua Yin, Sujuan Yu, Zhenlin Liu, Boqi Jia, Chenxi Shi, Yanfang Xu, Yun Tian, Xiaoxiao Luan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shaohua YinMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Sujuan YuMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhenlin LiuMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Boqi JiaMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Chenxi ShiMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Yanfang XuMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Yun TianMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6172-940X
Xiaoxiao LuanMedical Engineering Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0009-0007-0767-2757

Funding

Peking University Third Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive analytics has emerged as an important component of hospital automation by enabling proactive resource management and data-driven decision-making. Efficient allocation of patient monitors in operating rooms represents a practical application where forecasting can support perioperative safety and resource management. This study compared five forecasting models for predicting patient monitor availability using integrated clinical, operational, and equipment management data to identify appropriate forecasting approaches for operating room resource planning. We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study using monthly surgical operational data from the anesthesia information system and equipment-related data from the medical equipment management system of a tertiary referral hospital. The outcome was the monthly number of available patient monitors recorded in the equipment management system, which served as the reference value for evaluating five prediction models, including naïve persistence, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), multivariable linear regression, LSTM, and hybrid LSTM-regression. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Across a 36-month study period, the mean monthly surgical volume was 1960 (SD 182) procedures, with a mean operative duration of 105.0 (SD 3.5) minutes. Weighted multivariable regression showed that service age (standardized

Indexed as

equipment service agehealth resource allocationmachine learning modelpatient monitorprediction

Identifiers

PMID42791945
PMCPMC13603299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.