ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Integrating Predictive Analytics into Hospital Automation: Comparative Evaluation of Prediction Models for Patient Monitor Demand in Operating Rooms.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predictive analytics has emerged as an important component of hospital automation by enabling proactive resource management and data-driven decision-making. Efficient allocation of patient monitors in operating rooms represents a practical application where forecasting can support perioperative safety and resource management. This study compared five forecasting models for predicting patient monitor availability using integrated clinical, operational, and equipment management data to identify appropriate forecasting approaches for operating room resource planning. We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study using monthly surgical operational data from the anesthesia information system and equipment-related data from the medical equipment management system of a tertiary referral hospital. The outcome was the monthly number of available patient monitors recorded in the equipment management system, which served as the reference value for evaluating five prediction models, including naïve persistence, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), multivariable linear regression, LSTM, and hybrid LSTM-regression. Model performance was evaluated using root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Across a 36-month study period, the mean monthly surgical volume was 1960 (SD 182) procedures, with a mean operative duration of 105.0 (SD 3.5) minutes. Weighted multivariable regression showed that service age (standardized
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.