ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Identification of Gait Abnormalities in Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis Using a Monocular Vision 3D Motion Capture System.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the accuracy of video-based kinematic measurements using artificial intelligence (AI) between patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) and healthy participants, and to compare the gait abnormality estimated from video data with that calculated using optical three-dimensional motion capture (MOCAP) data. This study used open-access datasets of MOCAP and video data including 20 patients with hip OA and 20 healthy participants. Video data were processed using the MYoACT application to extract marker data. The mean absolute error (MAE) of joint angles between MOCAP and MYoACT data was calculated. In patients with hip OA, the modified Gait Abnormality Score (mGAS) for each joint angle was calculated by averaging the absolute differences between each patient's value and the mean value of healthy participants, divided by the standard deviation of healthy participants, across the entire gait cycle. No significant difference in the MAE was observed between groups. In patients with hip OA, the mGAS showed no significant difference between MYoACT and MOCAP data. These findings suggest that AI-driven video-based kinematic measurements show no clear difference in the accuracy between patients with hip OA and healthy participants, and demonstrate the potential to identify gait abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.