ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Structural and Functional Biomechanical Classifications of the Discoid Meniscus.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discoid meniscus is a morphologic variant associated with altered biomechanics and an increased risk of tearing, yet the systems used to classify it have historically emphasized shape over function. This review examines how classification of the discoid meniscus has evolved, from early morphologic schemes such as the Watanabe classification to more comprehensive frameworks that account for peripheral rim stability, tear characteristics, and functional relevance. We discuss later systems proposed by Klingele, Good, and Yang, which recognized rim stability and tear patterns as key determinants of symptoms and surgical management, and we describe how the PRiSM classification consolidates these advances into a standardized, reproducible system incorporating morphology, thickness, stability, and tear characteristics. We further frame the discoid meniscus as a biomechanical entity in which disorganized collagen, abnormal peripheral attachment, and impaired hoop-stress transmission shape tissue behavior and healing potential. Finally, we argue that future classification systems should integrate morphologic, biomechanical, compositional, and imaging biomarkers to better characterize tissue quality, predict repair outcomes, and guide patient-specific, tissue-preserving treatment. Uniting structure and function within a single framework may improve prognostication and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.