Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791927›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

SERA-Net: Rethinking CNN Design for Brain Tumor Classification via Squeeze-and-Excite Attention and Residual Learning.

Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo, Surendra Kumar Nanda, Ganapati Panda, Ashutosh Soni, Jayanti Rout, Manob Jyoti Saikia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jyoti Ranjan SahooBiomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-1697-3773
Surendra Kumar NandaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, C. V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar 752054, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7809-2131
Ganapati PandaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, C. V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar 752054, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3555-5685
Ashutosh SoniBiomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1196-385X
Jayanti RoutBiomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7597-131X
Manob Jyoti SaikiaBiomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6656-4333

Funding

Biomedical Sensors & Systems Lab, University of Memphis TN 38152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A brain tumor is a life-threatening disease that carries a high mortality burden. It can be treated if detected in the early stages. Manual analysis by a radiologist using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is effective but slow and subject to inter-observer variability. In order to automate it, various deep learning models, especially Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have been widely used. However, most of them rely on frozen, ImageNet-based pretrained backbones, where only a small classification head is updated during training. This leaves a large segment of parameters unable to adapt to the domain shift between natural images and MRI scans. This limits how far such models can be modified or improved further. This makes the model highly parameter-centric and unsuitable for development. In addition, most studies fail to provide insights on architectural choices, which inhibits reproduction and modifications. In order to alleviate these issues, this study presents SERA-Net, a convolutional architecture for brain tumor classification using MRI scans. It is trained from scratch and quantifies the performance of each model using an incremental ablation study. It consists of four blocks comprising different components, such as Squeeze-and-Excite channel attention, residual connections, a wider classification head, etc. Rather than proposing new operations, the contribution lies in the systematic, ablation-driven combination and empirical validation of established architectural components for this specific task. The model was trained and evaluated on a publicly available MRI dataset. With just ≈5 million parameters, it achieved an accuracy of 95.44%, an F1-score of 0.953, and various near-ideal parameters. It was observed to outperform six pretrained CNN baselines by more than 5-10%, while using substantially fewer parameters. Various other analyses indicate the efficacy of the proposed approach in detecting brain tumors. The proposed approach provides a scalable design that can be adapted to different domains with limited modifications.

Indexed as

brain tumorCNNdeep learningmagnetic resonance imagingpretrained model

Identifiers

PMID42791927
PMCPMC13603351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.