Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791926›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

From Oscillations to Brain States: Real-Time EEG-TMS for Adaptive Neuromodulation.

Melissa Null, Elena Mongiardini, Chiara Leu, Giulia Liberati, Paolo Belardinelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa NullCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4147-7214
Elena MongiardiniCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-4579-6129
Chiara LeuCenter for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Department of Neurology and TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3524-2195
Giulia LiberatiInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Paolo BelardinelliCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9290-1804

Funding

Hub Life Science- Advanced Diagnosis (HLS-AD) PNC-E3-2022-23683266 PNC-HLS-DA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) enables non-invasive, focal modulation of cortical circuits by inducing electric currents in the brain through electromagnetic induction, thereby influencing neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity. High inter- and intra-individual variability has led, however, to moderate efficacy and reproducibility of stimulation and treatment protocols, motivating a shift toward brain-state-dependent stimulation. Over the past decade, real-time phase-triggered EEG-TMS has established the oscillatory phase-particularly focusing on the sensorimotor mu rhythm-as a key determinant of cortical excitability and plasticity modulation. The field, however, remains largely confined to univariate, sensor-space analyses of local mu-rhythm phase, missing large-scale network dynamics. Recent advances in online EEG source reconstruction and multivariate machine and deep learning (ML/DL) approaches have begun to move beyond local phase toward whole-brain, network-level state estimation, achieving encouraging preliminary accuracies in predicting trial-by-trial cortical excitability, with promising applications in network-dysregulation conditions such as chronic pain. Integrating source-space reconstruction and individual biological variability, and adaptive ML/DL pipelines into closed-loop frameworks promises to move beyond generic stimulation protocols toward selective, network-targeted neuromodulation tailored to the individual's dynamic brain state. Against this background, this review provides a critical overview of current achievements and limitations, while highlighting emerging methodological directions toward fully brain-state-adaptive and network-targeted EEG-TMS. We further present an illustrative use case of adaptive EEG-TMS for pain modulation, where treatment responses remain heterogeneous and the relevant dynamics are distributed across networks, and which therefore stands to gain most from individualized, network-targeted protocols.

Indexed as

brain-state-dependent stimulationclosed-loop neuromodulationelectroencephalographyneuroplasticitysensorimotor mu rhythmtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42791926
PMCPMC13603133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.