ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
From Bench to Operating Room: A Comparative Study of Tensile and Puncture Tests in Self-Assembled Constructs with Clinical Feedback.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urethral reconstruction is required for a variety of congenital and acquired conditions. Current grafting techniques rely on autologous tissues such as buccal mucosa, which are often limited by donor-site morbidity. Biomaterials could be an alternative. However, they may present immunological risks and inconsistent surgical outcomes. The tissue-engineering self-assembly approach, which uses autologous patient cells to generate tissue constructs without exogenous biomaterials, offers a promising alternative by improving graft integration. Such natural tissue-engineered constructs exhibit promising histological similarity to native urethral tissue and hold potential for clinical application. However, graft selection for surgery remains subjective, lacking standardized mechanical criteria to ensure consistent quality. Previous efforts to quantify graft properties through uniaxial tensile testing have proven informative but require cutting the tissue into standardized specimens and are therefore not readily suited to routine quality-control workflows. To address this, we investigated puncture testing as a simpler practical alternative that does not require tissue cutting and assessed its correlation with tensile testing and surgeon-based evaluation. Self-assembled dermal and urethral constructs were evaluated using uniaxial tensile and puncture tests, and results were correlated with the surgeon's qualitative assessments during graft handling. Our findings reveal a strong linear relationship between two mechanical testing techniques. Puncture testing also showed a strong relationship with surgeon-based qualitative assessments of graft handling. This study highlights the potential of puncture testing as a practical mechanical assessment tool for characterizing graft mechanical behavior in the context of surgical handling, and offers a pathway toward the development of standardized, objective quality control protocols for tissue-engineered urethral grafts prior to implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.