Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791923›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

From Bench to Operating Room: A Comparative Study of Tensile and Puncture Tests in Self-Assembled Constructs with Clinical Feedback.

Elissa Elia, Marilou Hardy, Riham Mira Bensalem, Yudai Sahuc, Yannick Rioux, David Brownell, Stéphane Chabaud, Julie Fradette, Stéphane Bolduc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elissa EliaDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Marilou HardyDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Riham Mira BensalemFaculty of Pharmacy, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38700 Grenoble, France.
Yudai SahucDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Yannick RiouxCentre de Recherche en Organogenèse Expérimentale de l'Université Laval/LOEX, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Axe Médecine Régénératrice, Quebec City, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-8911-235X
David BrownellDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-8034-5385
Stéphane ChabaudCentre de Recherche en Organogenèse Expérimentale de l'Université Laval/LOEX, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Axe Médecine Régénératrice, Quebec City, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0389-667X
Julie FradetteDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1851-5112
Stéphane BolducDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6680-5563

Funding

CIHR 525915Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CG140163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urethral reconstruction is required for a variety of congenital and acquired conditions. Current grafting techniques rely on autologous tissues such as buccal mucosa, which are often limited by donor-site morbidity. Biomaterials could be an alternative. However, they may present immunological risks and inconsistent surgical outcomes. The tissue-engineering self-assembly approach, which uses autologous patient cells to generate tissue constructs without exogenous biomaterials, offers a promising alternative by improving graft integration. Such natural tissue-engineered constructs exhibit promising histological similarity to native urethral tissue and hold potential for clinical application. However, graft selection for surgery remains subjective, lacking standardized mechanical criteria to ensure consistent quality. Previous efforts to quantify graft properties through uniaxial tensile testing have proven informative but require cutting the tissue into standardized specimens and are therefore not readily suited to routine quality-control workflows. To address this, we investigated puncture testing as a simpler practical alternative that does not require tissue cutting and assessed its correlation with tensile testing and surgeon-based evaluation. Self-assembled dermal and urethral constructs were evaluated using uniaxial tensile and puncture tests, and results were correlated with the surgeon's qualitative assessments during graft handling. Our findings reveal a strong linear relationship between two mechanical testing techniques. Puncture testing also showed a strong relationship with surgeon-based qualitative assessments of graft handling. This study highlights the potential of puncture testing as a practical mechanical assessment tool for characterizing graft mechanical behavior in the context of surgical handling, and offers a pathway toward the development of standardized, objective quality control protocols for tissue-engineered urethral grafts prior to implantation.

Indexed as

mechanical propertiespuncture testself-assemblytissue engineeringuniaxial tensile testurethral reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42791923
PMCPMC13603881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.