Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791916›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Machine Learning and Explainable AI for Breast Cancer Patient Prioritization: An Intelligent Decision-Support Framework.

Fabián Silva-Aravena, Jenny Morales, Hugo Núñez Delafuente, César González-Zúñiga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabián Silva-AravenaFacultad de Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, Universidad Católica del Maule, Avenida San Miguel 3605, Talca 3460000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2468-1480
Jenny MoralesFacultad de Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, Universidad Católica del Maule, Avenida San Miguel 3605, Talca 3460000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9940-0490
Hugo Núñez DelafuenteFacultad de Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, Universidad Católica del Maule, Avenida San Miguel 3605, Talca 3460000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3600-0507
César González-ZúñigaGrupo APEMIN, Facultad de Administración y Negocios, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca 3460000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6491-8652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer continues to represent a major global health burden, highlighting the need for effective approaches to risk stratification and clinical decision support. Conventional methods, including the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and histopathological classifications, primarily rely on clinical assessments and may not fully account for relevant demographic and behavioral characteristics. To overcome these limitations, we present an integrated framework combining K-Means clustering, Random Forest classification, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to support breast cancer risk stratification and patient prioritization. The proposed methodology uses clustering to stratify patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, followed by supervised machine learning to reproduce the cluster-derived risk categories, achieving an accuracy of 98%. To enhance interpretability, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) are incorporated to identify the variables that most strongly influence individual classifications, including body mass index (BMI), breastfeeding practices, and maternal age. By integrating multiple dimensions of patient information, the framework provides a more comprehensive characterization of risk while increasing the transparency of the decision-making process. Its relatively simple and scalable architecture also facilitates potential implementation in healthcare environments with limited resources. Simulation experiments further provide a proof-of-concept evaluation of the proposed prioritization approach. Compared with random patient selection, the strategy achieved a substantially higher average severity score (1.66 vs. 0.92) and prioritized 4.3 times more high-risk patients. These findings suggest that the proposed framework can serve as an intelligent decision-support tool for prioritizing breast cancer patients and improving resource allocation when healthcare capacity is constrained.

Indexed as

breast cancer riskdecision support systemsexplainable artificial intelligencemachine learningpatient prioritization

Identifiers

PMID42791916
PMCPMC13603238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.