Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791893›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Evaluating the Performance of LYDIA: An AI-Powered Assistant in the Detection of Metastatic Tumors to Optimize Clinical Workflows and Inform Soft Tissue Surgical Decision-Making.

Georgios Eleftherios Kalykakis, Isaak Tarampoulous, Athanasia Sepsa, Giorgos Agrogiannis, Giannis Vamvakaris, Menelaos G Samaras, Christos Spyropoulos, Chrysostomos Manolis, Nikolaos Niotis, Thomas Papathymiopoylos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Georgios Eleftherios KalykakisDeepPath PC, N.Psychiko, 15451 Athens, Greece.
Isaak TarampoulousDeepPath PC, N.Psychiko, 15451 Athens, Greece.
Athanasia Sepsa1st Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Giorgos Agrogiannis1st Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Giannis VamvakarisDepartment of Pathology, Sotiria Chest Diseases Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece.
Menelaos G Samaras2nd Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece.
Christos SpyropoulosDeepPath PC, N.Psychiko, 15451 Athens, Greece.
Chrysostomos ManolisDeepPath PC, N.Psychiko, 15451 Athens, Greece.
Nikolaos NiotisDeepPath PC, N.Psychiko, 15451 Athens, Greece.
Thomas PapathymiopoylosDeepPath PC, N.Psychiko, 15451 Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos N VougasDeepPath PC, N.Psychiko, 15451 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8873-4740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into digital histopathology has the potential to improve the accuracy and efficiency of metastatic cancer diagnosis. We evaluated LYDIA (LYmph noDe assIstAnt), an AI-based decision-support system, for both standalone diagnostic performance and its impact on histopathologists' workflow, diagnostic accuracy, and resource utilization. LYDIA was evaluated on a blinded dataset of 366 whole-slide images (WSIs) from breast, colorectal, lung, and skin cancers. Standalone performance demonstrated excellent discrimination, achieving ROC-AUC values of 0.995, 0.963, 0.973, and 0.983 for breast, colorectal, lung, and skin cancers, respectively. Clinical utility was further assessed in a multi-reader study involving four experienced histopathologists interpreting 105 WSIs with and without AI assistance. AI-assisted diagnosis significantly reduced time-to-diagnosis across all metastasis sizes, with a maximum 1.59-fold acceleration for micro-metastases, corresponding to a mean time saving of 26.5 s per WSI. LYDIA also improved diagnostic sensitivity from 77.3% to 87.3%. These findings demonstrate that LYDIA can enhance both the efficiency and accuracy of lymph node metastasis detection while reducing diagnostic workload and the need for ancillary testing. Beyond improving routine pathology workflows, the system's rapid inference capabilities and human-expert level performance may support future intraoperative diagnostic applications, enabling timely and automatic or semi-automatic assessment of nodal status to inform surgical decision-making. The resulting reductions in diagnostic time and ancillary testing costs have the potential to improve healthcare resource utilization and patient care, mainly in soft tissue reconstruction and surgical repair decisions.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)cost–benefit analysisdiagnostic accuracydigital pathologymetastasis detectionsoft tissue reconstructionsoft tissue repairwhole slide imaging (WSI)workflow efficiency

Identifiers

PMID42791893
PMCPMC13603246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.