ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Protect the Brain When Treating the Heart: Feasibility of 2.5D U-Net for Real-Time Gaseous Microemboli Detection.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gaseous microemboli (GME) represent a common complication of cardiac structural interventions across both surgical and transcatheter approaches. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) represents a convenient methodology to monitor and visualize the presence of circulating GME. However, their detection and quantification are far from trivial due to operator-dependent view, high velocity, and objects with similar structure in the background. Here, we propose a feasibility study based on a 2.5D U-Net architecture to detect GME in space-time connected data. We applied and tested such an architecture on a pilot dataset of eight TEE recordings (60 fps, 600×800 pixels) from eight different patients undergoing cardiac surgery, resulting in improved detection of moving GMEs against the background with respect to classical spot detection algorithms and 2D U-Net, yet retaining real-time execution speed with respect to more complex deep-learning architectures. Under leave-one-patient-out cross-validation, the selected model achieved strong detection performance under a three-pixel radius-tolerant grace-zone evaluation, with a precision of 92.55% and recall of 80.54%, corresponding to radius-tolerant Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice coefficients of 73.95% and 84.13%, respectively. Complementarily, strict pixel-based segmentation metrics were also computed, yielding an IoU of 41.74% and a Dice coefficient of 57.98%. The selected model achieved an average inference time of 0.12 s per batch on the tested hardware. To assess specificity on unseen data, we additionally evaluated the model on an external GME-negative TEE dataset, where it produced predominantly empty or near-empty masks, indicating a low rate of spurious detections. These results support the technical feasibility of real-time GME segmentation, although broader clinical validation on larger multi-patient, multicenter datasets is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.