Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791885›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Three-Dimensional Measurement and Analysis of Rod Deformation for Spinal Deformity Correction: A Novel Methodology.

Sam W Hendricks, Cale J Hendricks, Arin M Ellingson, David W Polly, Arthur G Erdman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sam W HendricksDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55454 MN, USA.
Cale J HendricksDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55454 MN, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9004-6912
Arin M EllingsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55454 MN, USA.
David W PollyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55454 MN, USA.
Arthur G ErdmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0385-4023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of rod contour is a critical factor that influences sagittal and coronal alignment for posterior spinal fusion. Distraction techniques to correct spinal deformity, which are often three-dimensional (3D) in nature, are known to cause rod deformation from the ideal, planned rod curvature. Therefore, surgeons often overbend rods to account for this phenomenon. Currently, there is no agreed-upon method to scientifically quantify rod unbending, and no methods offer a 3D analysis. The proposed methodology addresses this gap. By aligning the 3D rod centerlines, the segmented area enclosed between the two lines serves as a measure of rod deformation. This paper presents the foundational principles and concepts for quantifying 3D rod deformation. With further research and clinical implementation, this methodology has the potential to provide valuable surgical insight, which could improve postoperative spinal alignment and outcomes.

Indexed as

deformity correctionposterior spinal fusionrod contouringthree-dimensional analysis

Identifiers

PMID42791885
PMCPMC13603990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.