ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimuscle Surface-EMG Characterization of Upper-Limb Fatigue During Repetitive Haptic Interaction for Health 5.0 Applications.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health 5.0 increasingly involves medical robots and haptic systems that sustain physical interaction with patients and clinicians. This proof-of-concept study examined fatigue-related surface electromyography (sEMG) spectral changes during a 400 s repetitive haptic-writing task in 20 adults. Five upper-limb muscles were monitored at 1000 Hz, and mean frequency (MNF) and median frequency (MDF) trajectories were summarized by fitted start-to-end spectral decline and combined into arm-level indices. MDF had the higher association with the archived participant-level fatigue-analysis score (r=0.954 versus r=0.783; Δr=0.171; Holm-adjusted p=0.0035). Small-sample influence analysis supported the stability of this within-sample ordering: after omitting each participant in turn, Δr remained positive in 20/20 analyses (range 0.125-0.218), although the exact paired label-swap sensitivity test remained inconclusive (p=0.082). Exploratory leave-one-participant-out calibration produced lower held-out error for MDF (MAE 4.38, RMSE 5.87 percentage points) than for MNF (MAE 9.24, RMSE 12.02 percentage points). The raw seven-category Q2 responses and the archived 0-100 analysis score are reported as separate data products because they are not numerically equivalent under direct linear rescaling. Accordingly, the results identify MDF as the more promising spectral summary for prospective validation in this task, rather than establishing universal superiority or numerical replacement of subjective fatigue. The experiment was a laboratory haptic-writing study and did not test a surgical robot, rehabilitation robot, patient population, or clinical controller; Health 5.0 is therefore presented as a translational motivation rather than a demonstrated application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.