ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
From Reactive to Proactive Healthcare: Synergizing Wearable Biomarkers and Machine Learning in Digital Therapeutics.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of digital therapeutics (DTx), wearable electronic devices, and artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant advancement in personalized healthcare. The primary purpose of this structured narrative review is to evaluate the convergence of these technologies, providing a consolidated framework that bridges the gap between raw biometric data acquisition and actionable, AI-driven clinical insights. This paper synthesizes the latest literature on the intersection of mobile health (mHealth), machine learning (ML), and physiological tracking, with a primary focus on heart rate variability (HRV) and associated biochemical markers, such as cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase, and interleukins. Instead of viewing wearable outputs simply as raw data, we critically evaluate the technical verification and clinical validation required to define them as true "digital biomarkers." By evaluating multimodal sensor technologies and advanced predictive algorithms, this paper outlines the clinical utility of digital biomarkers in diagnosing and proactively managing cardiovascular, neurological, metabolic, and psychiatric conditions, noting classification accuracies frequently exceeding 85% in controlled settings. However, we strongly caution that internally validated performance in controlled settings does not inherently demonstrate external clinical utility. The clinical relevance of this study lies in its holistic approach to identifying how continuous monitoring can broaden healthcare accessibility while improving precision medicine. Furthermore, it deeply addresses the technical challenges of highly variable ambulatory data quality, the necessity for robust artifact reduction (e.g., via LSTM and GAN architectures), and the limitations of small, homogeneous training datasets. We highlight the essential need for demographic-aware algorithmic models, external validation, and decentralized privacy-preserving models (e.g., federated learning) in diverse populations to ensure the safe, equitable clinical translation of DTx, mHealth, ML, and AI technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42791849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.