ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Frequency and Direction-Dependent Shear-Wave Responses in Ex Vivo Tissues Measured by a Time-of-Flight Device.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shear-wave time-of-flight (TOF) measurement enables controlled assessment of frequency-dependent wave propagation, but its feasibility in biological tissues remains insufficiently established. This study evaluated whether a custom shear-wave TOF device could detect frequency- and direction-dependent responses in ex vivo tissues. Three porcine liver samples and three chicken breast samples were examined. Chicken breast was measured with propagation parallel and perpendicular to visible muscle fibers. One-cycle sinusoidal excitations were applied at 40-160 Hz, with 50 acquisitions ensemble-averaged per sample-frequency measurement. TOF was estimated using Tx threshold detection and cumulative-energy-based Rx onset detection, and TOF-derived apparent shear-wave propagation speed was calculated from the Tx-Rx distance and the measured TOF. Frequency-dependent data were fitted using the Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative model to obtain model-dependent KVFD fit parameters. Signal quality was assessed, and a preliminary descriptive comparison with HISKY EQTouch UD3000 (Wuxi Hisky Medical Technologies Co., Ltd., Wuxi, China) SWE was performed. All 63 averaged sample-frequency measurements satisfied the predefined primary-detection criteria. Mean apparent shear-wave speed was 3.145 m/s in porcine liver, 6.133 m/s in chicken breast measured parallel to the fibers, and 5.914 m/s in chicken breast measured perpendicular to the fibers, giving a parallel-to-perpendicular speed ratio of 1.037. Mean post-averaging, post-processing SNR ranged from 24.47 to 31.52 dB. The UD3000 comparison showed the same tissue ranking. The device detected frequency- and direction-dependent responses in averaged ex vivo signals, supporting its feasibility as a controlled research platform. Claims of absolute stiffness accuracy and intrinsic muscle anisotropy require independent calibration and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.