Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791826›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Diagnostic Performance of Digital Tomosynthesis for Detecting Osteophytes and Subchondral Bone Changes in the Equine Distal Interphalangeal and Metacarpophalangeal Joints.

Alisa Hahn, Miguel Valdés Vázquez, Gabriel Manso-Díaz, Dagmar Berner, Joana Maia Ramos, Marcus G Doherr, Christoph J Lischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alisa HahnEquine Clinic, Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Oertzenweg 19b, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-1565-0421
Miguel Valdés VázquezHospital de Referencia La Equina, Apdo. 110, Camino de Martagina Km 1, 29692 Manilva, Málaga, Spain.
Gabriel Manso-DíazDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Avenida Puerta de Hierro, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-669X
Dagmar BernerEquine Referral Hospital, Department of Clinical Science and Services, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6442-3449
Joana Maia RamosHospital de Referencia La Equina, Apdo. 110, Camino de Martagina Km 1, 29692 Manilva, Málaga, Spain.
Marcus G DoherrInstitute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0064-1708
Christoph J LischerEquine Clinic, Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Oertzenweg 19b, 14163 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis is a common cause of equine lameness and can involve periarticular osteophytes and subchondral bone (SB) changes. This exploratory ex vivo study evaluated the diagnostic performance of digital tomosynthesis (DT) for detecting these findings in the distal interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints, using computed tomography (CT) classifications as the reference. Sixteen distal forelimbs from nine adult horses underwent imaging with both modalities under simulated weight-bearing conditions. Three independent observers graded osteophytes and SB changes, and the scores were dichotomised as absent or present for analysis. The primary analysis used a majority-based CT reference, defined by agreement of at least two observers. Observer-specific comparisons and within-observer DT-CT agreement were evaluated in a secondary analysis. In the primary analysis, sensitivity ranged from 23.1% (95% CI 9.5-39.3%) to 34.6% (95% CI 13.8-56.0%), specificity from 94.1% to 96.1%, Youden's index from 19.2% to 30.7%, and Cohen's κ from 0.249 to 0.377. Sensitivity was numerically higher for osteophytes than for SB changes for all three observers, without formal comparison. DT missed many CT-positive assessments but produced few false-positive classifications. Studies in live horses comparing DT with conventional radiography are needed to determine its additional diagnostic value.

Indexed as

computed tomographydigital tomosynthesisex vivomusculoskeletal imagingosteoarthritisosteophytessensitivity and specificitysubchondral bone

Identifiers

PMID42791826
PMCPMC13603353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.