ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Non-Coding Negative Regulatory Features in Livestock Genomes: Functional Annotation and Causal Validation.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-coding negative regulation is an important but incompletely resolved component of gene-expression control in livestock. We conducted a narrative review using PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus, prioritizing primary studies in pigs, cattle, sheep, goats, and poultry and using model-organism studies only for directly relevant mechanistic or methodological evidence. We distinguish sequence-defined silencers, context-dependent enhancer-silencer elements, functional microRNA-binding sites, long non-coding RNA-associated regulation, and candidate repressive chromatin regions, and evaluate representative livestock studies using a four-tier framework comprising candidate annotation, molecular functional evidence, endogenous causal evidence, and animal-level validation. Current evidence is strongest for a small number of loci, whereas many of the livestock candidates reviewed here are supported primarily by association, chromatin state, or in vitro assays. We further assess how multi-omics data can prioritize candidates and assign target genes, while emphasizing that reporter activity, repressive chromatin marks, and population association do not establish endogenous causality. Progress will depend on locus-specific perturbation, rescue experiments, relevant animal phenotyping, and inheritance testing. This evidence-centered framework provides a focused basis for interpreting negative regulatory variation in livestock and identifying robust targets for future genetic improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.