ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Global Potential Refugia and Conservation Gaps for Threatened Marine Rays Under Future Climate Change.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Climate change is redistributing marine biodiversity and may reduce the long-term effectiveness of static conservation networks. Threatened marine rays may be particularly vulnerable because many species have slow life histories, limited recovery capacity, and strong dependence on coastal and shelf habitats. However, the global distribution of habitats expected to remain suitable for threatened rays under severe future climate change, as well as their representation within existing marine protected areas, remain poorly understood. Here, we projected ensemble species distribution models for 85 threatened marine ray species for 2090-2100 under SSP5-8.5 and quantified habitat loss, persistence, gain, and net-richness change. Climate-resilient hotspots were identified from stable suitable-habitat richness and intersected with multi-source conservation-priority areas to delineate potential climate refugia. Habitat losses and negative net-richness changes were concentrated mainly in tropical and subtropical coastal waters, whereas gains were more extensive at higher latitudes. The Top 10% and Top 5% stable hotspots covered 6.47 and 3.89 million km
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.