Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791779›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Description of an Intraoral Lingual Arch Fixation Technique for the Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures in Dogs and Its Application in Six Patients.

Fidel San Román-Llorens, Alejandro Blanco, Fidel San Román, Cristina González, Alberto Climent, Ana Whyte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fidel San Román-LlorensDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zaragoza, C. Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2206-1886
Alejandro BlancoDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zaragoza, C. Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0009-0001-4458-8665
Fidel San RománDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro, s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Cristina GonzálezDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zaragoza, C. Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-3530-4513
Alberto ClimentDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zaragoza, C. Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-9173-6096
Ana WhyteDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zaragoza, C. Miguel Servet, 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mandibular fractures are a common injury in dogs and are associated with relatively high complication rates. The main goals of treatment are to provide stable fixation to promote bone healing, preserve the teeth and surrounding anatomical structures, and restore normal dental occlusion. Several treatment techniques have been described, including external skeletal fixation, bone plates and screws, interdental and intraosseous cerclage wiring, and dental splints used alone or in combination with cerclage fixation. However, all have inherent limitations. The objective of this study was to describe a novel intraoral fixation technique and evaluate its clinical application. The technique consists of a lingual arch anchored to the teeth or mandibular bone using cerclage wires and reinforced with bis-acrylic resin. Six dogs presenting with 11 mandibular body fractures, 10 of them opened toward oral cavity and with anatomically unfavorable configurations, were treated. The fractures were located rostral to or involved the alveolus of the first premolar. Ten fractures were open and potentially contaminated through the oral cavity, while one was closed. All patients achieved bone healing (mean, 70.8 days; range, 63-96 days). All patients recovered their pre-traumatic dental occlusion and showed no dental damage as a consequence of the intervention. The only complication observed in all cases was irritation of the oral mucosa at the contact points with the fixator. This resolved favorably within one week without antibiotic treatment. The potential advantages and limitations of the technique compared with existing fixation methods are also discussed.

Indexed as

dogsfractureintraoral fixationmandibular

Identifiers

PMID42791779
PMCPMC13603277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.