Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791751›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Distilled Water Dilution Increases Measured Fecal pH in Fresh Canine Feces.

Pedro Henrique Marchi, Carolina Dantas Micheletti, Jennifer Machado de Souza, Gabriela Luiza Fagundes Finardi, Eduarda Lorena Fernandes, Nicholas Sartini Santiago, Luana Dias Dos Santos, Matheus Henrique Dos Santos, Júlio Cesar de Carvalho Balieiro, Thiago Henrique Annibale Vendramini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pedro Henrique MarchiPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-0103-8785
Carolina Dantas MichelettiPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Jennifer Machado de SouzaPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Gabriela Luiza Fagundes FinardiPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Eduarda Lorena FernandesPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Nicholas Sartini SantiagoPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Luana Dias Dos SantosPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.
Matheus Henrique Dos SantosPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0000-0003-4815
Júlio Cesar de Carvalho BalieiroPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0540-1850
Thiago Henrique Annibale VendraminiPet Nutrology Research Center, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Sao Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4457-8392

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Process 2022/06499-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Process 2024/19916-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Process 2025/04098-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Process 2025/08559-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Process 2026/02068-1National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 301408/2025-4National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 309189/2023-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal pH is used in canine nutrition studies as an indirect indicator of intestinal fermentation, but sample preparation may affect the measured value. This study evaluated the effect of different feces-to-water dilution ratios on pH determination in canine feces. Thirty-seven samples from 20 healthy dogs were evaluated using five preparation protocols: direct measurement without dilution and dilution with distilled water at 1:1, 1:2, 1:5, and 1:10 feces-to-water ratios, on a weight-to-volume basis. Sample preparation affected fecal pH (

Indexed as

analytical standardizationpotentiometrysample preparation

Identifiers

PMID42791751
PMCPMC13603678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.