ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
"Learning to Live Without Him in My Home When a Piece of My Heart Went with Him": End-of-Life Decision-Making Experiences of Companion Animal Caregivers.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As companion animals approach end of life, their caregivers often face complex decisions that require balancing their pet's quality of life, relief from suffering, potential medical interventions, financial and resource barriers, and the difficult question of whether and when to pursue euthanasia. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how companion animal caregivers experience end-of-life decision-making for their pet and the care they received from their veterinary team. The study examined the experiences of 143 pet caregivers who responded to an online survey between September and December 2025. Data collection included caregiver's responses to four open-ended prompts inquiring about their experiences with their pet's end-of-life. Questions explored what they regarded as the most challenging and meaningful aspects, regrets they held about their pet's death, and advice for veterinarians about how best to support pet owners in their pet's final moments. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Results highlighted caregivers' distress surrounding decisions about whether and when they should pursue euthanasia. Caregivers described balancing multiple considerations in their decision-making, including their pet's overall welfare, the needs and perspectives of family members, resource constraints, access to specialized veterinary care, and their own caregiving fatigue. Their responses demonstrated grief, regret, guilt, and meaning making. Veterinarians' compassion, transparency, and forward-thinking enabled caregivers to plan for rituals and meaningful death experiences for their pets and their families. Suggestions for veterinary care emphasized the importance of relationship-centered care in addition to technical expertise. Veterinary end-of-life care should prioritize empathy, early and transparent communication, and opportunities for cherished time during the pet's final moments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.