ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Analysis and Comparison of the Laboratory and Ultrasonographic Findings in Cattle with Various Types of Small and Large Intestinal Ileus.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The laboratory and ultrasonographic findings in 1163 cattle with one of 11 types of ileus, including caecal dilatation, compression, haemorrhagic bowel syndrome, mesenteric torsion, paralytic ileus, incarceration, intussusception, obstruction, strangulation, volvulus, and torsion of the spiral colon were compared. The prevalences of the individual laboratory and ultrasonographic findings varied greatly among the different types of ileus; hypochloraemia ranged from 98.4 to 12.4%, hypokalaemia from 98.4 to 42.4%, azotaemia from 91.9 to 38.3%, acidosis from 47.8 to 3.3%, and haemoconcentration from 71.7 to 23.2%. Ultrasonographically, dilated small intestine varied from 100 to 43.3%, intestinal atony from 98.4 to 0%, free abdominal fluid from 66.7 to 16.0%, abomasal dilatation from 44.4 to 0%, and empty poststenotic small intestine from 34.9 to 0%. The cause of the ileus was detected in only 12.0% of the cattle examined. Ultrasonography is ideally suited for the visualisation of typical signs characteristic of ileus (intestinal dilatation and intestinal atony) but less so for determining the cause. The differences among the variables can be explained primarily by the type of ileus, the duration of illness, and the localisation of the intestinal ileus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.