ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Foie Gras Production: A Literature Review on the Welfare Implications of Force-Feeding of Ducks.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foie gras production is based on the force-feeding (gavage) of waterfowl to induce hepatic steatosis and subsequent liver enlargement. This practice has been widely debated due to concerns regarding animal welfare. This review provides a comprehensive overview of foie gras production, with a primary focus on the welfare implications of force-feeding in ducks, while contextualising historical and alternative practices involving geese. Evidence was evaluated across behavioural, physiological, pathological and health-related outcomes, together with procedural, housing and environmental factors. Endocrine findings are mixed, but repeated restraint and tube insertion can cause injuries to the upper digestive tract, while progressive feed administration produces marked liver enlargement, altered hepatic function and increased metabolic heat load. Reduced activity, locomotor impairment, lesions and elevated mortality have also been reported, although study designs and production methods and conditions vary. Alternatives under investigation include spontaneous fattening, microbiome-based interventions, cultivated-cell products and plant-based or processed analogues. Evidence concerning their welfare benefits, product quality, scalability and economic feasibility remains limited. Overall, the accumulated scientific evidence raises significant concerns regarding the welfare of force-fed birds and underscores the need for continued exploration of viable alternative production strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.