ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2026
Empathic concern for violators modulates victims' evaluation of third-party punishment outcomes: behavioral and electroencephalography evidence.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When fairness conflicts with empathy-induced altruism, victims often reduce punishment to protect violators' welfare. Whether this influence extends to outcome evaluations when punishment is implemented by third parties remains unclear. We combined an adapted Third-Party Dictator Game with electroencephalography to address this. Participants received unfair allocations from violators and evaluated third-party punishment (TPP) outcomes. Empathic concern was induced by portraying violators as being in need. Behaviorally, victims in the empathy (vs. non-empathy) condition rated no-punishment and partial-punishment outcomes as more appropriate but complete-punishment outcomes as less appropriate. Partial-punishment outcomes received the highest ratings in the empathy condition, reflecting a balance between protecting violators' welfare and restoring fairness. Neurally, partial-punishment outcomes induced smaller P2 amplitudes in the empathy (vs. non-empathy) condition, suggesting lower motivational salience because they better matched victims' goals. No-punishment outcomes induced larger late positive potential amplitudes in the empathy (vs. non-empathy) condition, reflecting sustained processing of their affective and motivational significance. Parietal alpha suppression was weaker in the empathy (vs. non-empathy) condition, indicating reduced sustained attention to TPP outcomes. Together, these findings suggest that empathic concern shapes victims' evaluations of third-party norm-enforcement outcomes, extending its influence beyond contexts in which the empathizing individual also implements punishment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.