ArticleBMC health services research2026
The importance of "being seen": a qualitative interview study of patient and clinician experiences of virtual and face-to-face TIA clinics in one region of England.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost NHS trusts introduced virtual clinics for managing transient ischaemic attack (TIA) during the Covid-19 pandemic. Some continue to use virtual clinics, whilst others returned to face-to-face or implemented hybrid clinics. There has been limited evaluation of the effectiveness and experience of patients and healthcare professionals (HP) of virtual TIA clinics.
methodsA rapid insights evaluation of the effectiveness of virtual TIA clinics took place in South East England. This paper focuses on findings from one part of the evaluation, which conducted qualitative interviews with 15 patients and 12 HPs across 6 NHS trusts to explore their views and experiences of different TIA clinic care models. Patient participants were identified by clinicians at first consultation with the TIA clinic. Telephone or video interviews were recorded and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsHPs reported that virtual clinics worked well for some patients (e.g., those not needing MRI/MRA imaging, older patients with co-morbidities/poor mobility, young working people, people living in rural areas) but not all. Most patients placed great importance on 'being seen' by a HP in a face-to-face consultation during their TIA care pathway. We identified two key themes which represent different yet complementary dimensions of the importance of 'being seen', highlighting the perceived value of face-to-face consultations over virtual TIA clinics: (1) Greater opportunities for communication; and (2) Feeling looked after and listened to by a multidisciplinary team.
conclusionsVirtual TIA clinics were perceived more positively by HPs than patients, who particularly valued face-to-face consultations. Yet HPs also identified distinct benefits of face-to-face consultations. Whilst further research is needed, our findings indicate that TIA service model design should consider how HPs interact with patients during assessment and diagnosis. A hybrid model of TIA clinic care may offer the greatest potential benefits to patients and clinicians. Offering choice of TIA clinic modality could be a priority, along with improved referral that reflects which patients are best suited to virtual or face-to-face care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.