Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791569›Full record

ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2026

Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology towards a standardized outcome set for clinical trials in Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn (HDFN): preliminary findings from two European advisory boards.

Enrico Lopriore, Maartje Mangelaars, Tom Verbiest, Wim Noel, Alexandra Starry, E J T Verweij, Katie Morris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Enrico LoprioreDepartment of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands.
Maartje MangelaarsJohnson & Johnson, Breda, Netherlands. mmangela@its.jnj.com.
Tom VerbiestJohnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Wim NoelJohnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Alexandra StarryCytel, Potsdamer Str. 58, 10785, Berlin, Germany.
E J T VerweijDepartment of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands.
Katie MorrisBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn (HDFN) remains a serious perinatal condition worldwide despite major advances in antenatal and postnatal care. A key gap in HDFN research is the absence of a standardized outcome set, leading to inconsistent reporting and limited comparability across studies identified during systematic literature review (SLR). Outcomes important to families, such as long-term neurodevelopment and emotional impact, are often overlooked. 2 separate European advisory boards with 7 HDFN experts were conducted to explore expert perspectives on outcomes that may inform future core outcome set (COS) development. The findings should be interpreted as a preliminary, descriptive outcome prioritization exercise rather than a finalized COS, as no joint consensus meeting, Delphi process, pre-specified consensus threshold, or patient/parent involvement was undertaken. Establishing a formal COS through a structured multi-stakeholder process could enhance research quality, support future evidence generation, and promote more consistent care.Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Advisory boardCore outcome setHDFNHemolytic disease of the fetus and newbornOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID42791569
PMCPMC13613678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.