Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791474›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2026

Integrated Structural and Dynamic Analysis Reveals Destabilizing Effects of KRAS Missense Variants Associated with Lung Cancer.

Md Sohel Mia, Bimal Kumar Datta, Khadija Akter, Tomal Krishno Das Topu, Jamima Mahzabin Shawon, Faisul Hossen, Abdur Rahman Pranto, Md Saklain Tanver Shadhin, Nowmee Tahsin, Safa H Qahl and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Md Sohel MiaDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh. soheldmc21@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7076-1458
Bimal Kumar DattaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA.
Khadija AkterDepartment of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh.
Tomal Krishno Das TopuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Jamima Mahzabin ShawonDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Faisul HossenDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Abdur Rahman PrantoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Md Saklain Tanver ShadhinDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Nowmee TahsinDepartment of Nutrition and Food Technology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Safa H QahlDepartment of Biological Science, College of Science, University of Jeddah, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Tahani BakhshDepartment of Biological Science, College of Science, University of Jeddah, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Md Enamul Kabir TalukderDepartment of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh. talukder.mek@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the established oncogenic role of KRAS in lung cancer and its predicted regulation by hsa-miR-134 and transcription factors (NCOA4, NR3C2, ETS2), we systematically catalogued genetic variation across the KRAS gene. In this study, we identified 21,598 SNPs, of which 475 were missense (2.19%), 580 were synonymous (2.68%), and 18,093 were intronic (83.77%). In silico prioritization combined with cross-validation in TCGA-LUAD and MSK-IMPACT cohorts identified four high-confidence deleterious variants (G13C, G13D, G60S, G60V), confirming the recurrence of G13C/G13D and highlighting the fully conserved switch II residue G60 as a structurally distinctive candidate. In MD simulations, G60S showed the largest conformational displacement (RMSD ≈ 8-9 Å), elevated per-residue flexibility (residues 28-37: 1.90 → 2.99 Å), increased terminal Rg, and reduced hydrogen-bond occupancy, suggesting localized, mutation-specific perturbations within the G-domain. In contrast, G13D maintained near-wild-type dynamics, indicating that functional impairment may not require global structural destabilization. Consistent ensemble analyses (PCA, DCCM, FEL) revealed a dominant single-mode rearrangement for G60S (PC1 ≈ 50.8%), a heterogeneous multi-state landscape for G60V, and a restricted low-energy ensemble for G13D, supporting distinct, position-specific mechanisms. Gene-gene and protein-protein interaction analyses linked KRAS to multiple signaling partners, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses associated KRAS with GTPase activity, Rac protein signaling, and the RAS-MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways implicated in lung cancer progression. Overall, these findings identify G13C, G13D, G60S, and G60V as high-priority candidates for experimental validation and may inform future strategies for genomic risk assessment and mutation-specific therapeutic intervention in lung cancer.

Indexed as

In silico predictionKRASLung cancerMissense SNPMolecular dynamics simulationProtein stability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.