ArticleJournal of ultrasound2026
Effect of transducer scanning velocity during extended field of view imaging acquisition on pennate and fusiform muscles echo intensity.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the effects of transducer scanning velocity on echo intensity (EI) of muscles with different architectures [biceps brachii (BB), vastus lateralis (VL), and tibialis anterior (TA)] and determined interrater reliability across velocities.
methodsIdeal transducer velocity for each muscle was determined by the ultrasound system and measured using reflective markers and video analysis. Fast and slow velocities were set at ±50% of the ideal velocity (i.e., control condition). Three images per velocity were collected in 40 participants, with speed controlled by a digital metronome. EI, adipose, and superficial tissue thicknesses were analyzed by two blinded raters using ImageJ
resultsInterrater reliability was excellent for all muscles and velocities (r ≥ 0.933). Significant differences were observed only in TA. Slow velocity produced higher EI in TA's superior compartment compared with control and fast conditions (5% and 6%, respectively), and higher EI in the inferior compartment compared with fast velocity (4%). However, all differences were within the SEM and below the MDC. No significant differences were observed in BB or VL.
conclusionTransducer scanning velocity affects EI measurements in TA compartments, particularly under slow conditions, although these differences may not represent true physiological changes. In contrast, BB and VL measurements were unaffected, and all velocities demonstrated excellent interrater reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42791460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.