Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791460›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2026

Effect of transducer scanning velocity during extended field of view imaging acquisition on pennate and fusiform muscles echo intensity.

Paulo Ricardo de David Evangelho, Bruno Turcatti-Mendez, Martina Weis Regert, Heinrich Leon Souza Viera, Marco Aurélio Vaz, Fábio Juner Lanferdini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paulo Ricardo de David EvangelhoBiomechanics Laboratory, Physical Education and Sports Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4878-0569
Bruno Turcatti-MendezBiomechanics Laboratory, Physical Education and Sports Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8096-1077
Martina Weis RegertBiomechanics Laboratory, Physical Education and Sports Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3515-2658
Heinrich Leon Souza VieraBiomechanics Laboratory, Physical Education and Sports Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6691-1681
Marco Aurélio VazExercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-3502
Fábio Juner LanferdiniBiomechanics Laboratory, Physical Education and Sports Center, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Roraima Avenue, 1000, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil. fabio.lanferdini@ufsm.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-7188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated the effects of transducer scanning velocity on echo intensity (EI) of muscles with different architectures [biceps brachii (BB), vastus lateralis (VL), and tibialis anterior (TA)] and determined interrater reliability across velocities.

methodsIdeal transducer velocity for each muscle was determined by the ultrasound system and measured using reflective markers and video analysis. Fast and slow velocities were set at ±50% of the ideal velocity (i.e., control condition). Three images per velocity were collected in 40 participants, with speed controlled by a digital metronome. EI, adipose, and superficial tissue thicknesses were analyzed by two blinded raters using ImageJ

resultsInterrater reliability was excellent for all muscles and velocities (r ≥ 0.933). Significant differences were observed only in TA. Slow velocity produced higher EI in TA's superior compartment compared with control and fast conditions (5% and 6%, respectively), and higher EI in the inferior compartment compared with fast velocity (4%). However, all differences were within the SEM and below the MDC. No significant differences were observed in BB or VL.

conclusionTransducer scanning velocity affects EI measurements in TA compartments, particularly under slow conditions, although these differences may not represent true physiological changes. In contrast, BB and VL measurements were unaffected, and all velocities demonstrated excellent interrater reliability.

Indexed as

Muscle qualityPanoramic imagingScanning velocitySkeletal muscleUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.