ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Geometric Determinants of Post-stenotic Energetics in Coarctation of Aorta: Linking Centerline Morphology to Downstream Energy Loss.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While pressure gradient remains the clinical gold standard for diagnosing coarctation of the aorta (CoA), it does not fully capture the complexity of post-stenotic flow behavior, particularly the elevated energy dissipation downstream of the coarctation arising from complex anatomy and flow dynamics. This study investigates the relationship between coarctation and descending aorta anatomy, post-stenotic flow energy loss, and its association with left ventricular (LV) workload. A cohort of 20 CoA patients was analyzed. Anatomical features, including centerline topology and cross-sectional area variation along the descending aorta, were extracted from CT and MRI images. Patient-specific multiscale computational simulations were employed to quantify three-dimensional aortic hemodynamics, cardiac function, and systemic hemodynamics. Results demonstrate that energy dissipation per unit volume in the descending aorta correlates with the combined effect of the kinetic energy available at the coarctation site and the centerline tangent angle difference between the coarctation site and the downstream descending aorta. These parameters were also found to significantly influence LV workload expended for post-stenotic energy loss. This study underscores the critical role of descending aorta anatomy in shaping post-coarctation flow energetics and highlights the importance of incorporating anatomical and energetic metrics alongside pressure gradients to better assess disease severity and cardiac burden in CoA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42791450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.