ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Global Perspectives on Radiotherapy Utilization for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy requiring multi-modality treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) may improve local control and resection rates, though evidence to support use across various stages of disease is mixed and evolving. This study sought to investigate international practice patterns and provider preferences for the use of radiotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of PDAC.
methodsA 39-item electronic survey was distributed in 2025 through three sub-specialty organizations to providers who have recently treated PDAC.
resultsA total of 176 PDAC providers from six continents completed the survey, with the majority practicing in Europe (n= 76, 43%) and North America (n= 62, 35%). Respondents included mostly surgeons (n= 143, 81%) with 81% (n= 142) practicing in academic centers. Nearly 1 in 5 respondents did not offer or consider any indication for neoadjuvant (n= 32, 19%) or adjuvant (n= 46, 30%) RT. The most commonly cited indication for neoadjuvant RT was for locally advanced disease (n= 88, 52%) and surgically unresectable disease (n= 86, 51%), while the use of adjuvant RT was primarily for positive surgical margins (n= 97, 63%) and positive nodal disease (n= 46, 30%).
conclusionIn an international cohort of surgeons and radiation oncologists, there is substantial variation in perceptions of effectiveness, management preferences, and the propensity to utilize radiotherapy for PDAC. These results underscore the lack of strong evidence to support management, and the need for consensus guidelines and clinical trials to inform best practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.