Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791429›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2026

MStargetR: a reproducible, containerised workflow for end-to-end targeted (MRM/SRM) mass spectrometry data processing in R.

Harrison Szemray, Vimalnath Nambiar, Dana Hicks, Samantha Lodge, Julien Wist, Nathan G Lawler, Luke Whiley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Harrison SzemrayCentre for Computational and Systems Medicine, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5829-540X
Vimalnath NambiarCentre for Computational and Systems Medicine, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5384-6788
Dana HicksCentre for Computational and Systems Medicine, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-8271
Samantha LodgeCentre for Computational and Systems Medicine, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-0462
Julien WistCentre for Computational and Systems Medicine, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3416-2572
Nathan G LawlerCentre for Computational and Systems Medicine, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9649-425X
Luke WhileyCentre for Computational and Systems Medicine, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia. luke.whiley@curtin.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-4799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTargeted metabolic phenotyping by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) relies on a fragmented toolchain of proprietary vendor formats, manual integration steps, and ad hoc quality-control (QC) scripts, introducing user- and laboratory-level variation that undermines reproducibility and confounds cross-laboratory and retrospective comparison.

objectivesTo provide an open-source, R-native workflow for targeted multiple reaction monitoring (MRM/SRM) mass spectrometry data that consolidates vendor file conversion, peak integration, and QC reporting into a single reproducible pipeline while preserving auditable, human-in-the-loop peak review.

methodsMStargetR builds on msConvert and Skyline through three modules: msConvertR (vendor-to-mzML conversion), PeakForgeR (peak boundary optimisation and automated peak integration executed through Skyline), and qcCheckR (normalisation, concentration calculation, signal and batch correction, and reporting). Additionally, MStargetR has a standalone correction module and a Shiny graphical user interface. Third-party tools are pinned in version-controlled Docker images (with Apptainer support for high-performance computing), and each analytical plate emits a fully populated sky document for inspection and reimport.

resultsApplied to a published targeted lipidomics dataset of 128 human plasma samples targeting 1,161 lipid species, MStargetR processed all samples end-to-end, recovering all 1,161 targeted lipid features, 949 of which (81.7%) were detected and returned RSD < 30% across replicated long-term reference QCs. Analysis scaled linearly to 4,200 samples, averaging 4.1 s per sample.

conclusionMStargetR delivers automated batch processing, auditable peak review, and a documented QC layer in a single reproducible pipeline, supporting FAIR-aligned targeted metabolomics.

Indexed as

Liquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMetabolomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidHumansMass SpectrometryQuality ControlReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareWorkflowLipidomicsMass spectrometryMultiple reaction monitoringPhenotypePrecision medicineReproducibility of resultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42791429
PMCPMC13615125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.