ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Is robotic surgery meeting nodal benchmarks? AJCC and NCCN-based evaluation of lymph node yield and survival in robotic transhiatal esophagectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdequate lymph node (LN) retrieval is a key determinant of staging quality in esophageal cancer, with current guidelines recommending evaluation of at least 15 nodes. However, the relevance of this threshold in robotic transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) remains unclear.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single-center cohort of patients undergoing robotic THE for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (2012-2024). Patients were stratified by LN yield (< 15 vs ≥ 15) according to AJCC and NCCN. Clinicopathologic variables, perioperative outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
resultsEighty-four patients were included, with 56 (66.7%) in the < 15 LN group and 28 (33.3%) in the ≥ 15 LN group. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Higher LN yield was associated with increased lymphovascular invasion (32.1% vs 9.0%, p = 0.012) and a trend toward higher nodal positivity (50.0% vs 30.4%, p = 0.079). Perioperative outcomes, including complications and mortality, were similar between groups. Median follow-up was 47.8 months. Median DFS was 33.6 months in the < 15 LN group and 97.9 months in the ≥ 15 LN group (p = 0.430), while median OS was not reached and 97.9 months, respectively (p = 0.555). At 3 years, DFS (65% vs 49%) and OS (75% vs 56%) were numerically higher in the ≥ 15 LN group.
conclusionsRetrieval of ≥ 15 lymph nodes during robotic THE is associated with improved pathologic characterization without increasing perioperative morbidity. Although survival differences were not statistically significant, higher LN yield demonstrated a consistent trend toward improved outcomes, supporting its role as a quality metric in robotic esophagectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42791411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.