Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791401›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026

Feasibility of large-scale in silico transcatheter aortic valve implantation trials using a fast-to-evaluate model.

Sabine Verstraeten, Marloes van Driel, Robin Willems, Sai Divi, Martijn Hoeijmakers, Frans van de Vosse, Clemens Verhoosel, Wouter Huberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabine Verstraeten *Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. sverstraeten06@gmail.com.
Marloes van Driel *Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Robin WillemsMechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Sai DiviMechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Martijn HoeijmakersSynopsys Inc, High Tech Campus 41, 5656 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Frans van de VosseBiomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Clemens VerhooselMechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Wouter HubertsBiomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Dominee Theodor Fliednerstraat 2, 5631 BN, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101017578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been demonstrated to be a successful treatment for aortic stenosis, it remains associated with complications, such as paravalvular leakage (PVL). To address these, TAVI devices continue to undergo iterative development. Integration of in silico trials into the regulatory validation pathway offers a promising approach to accelerate the development and clinical implementation of novel TAVI devices. This study addresses the feasibility of conducting large-scale in silico TAVI trials using a virtual cohort generator (VCG) combined with a fast-to-evaluate model. The objective is to investigate anatomical and procedural predictors of PVL in silico, as was done in an earlier clinical study. A virtual cohort of 500 synthetic aortic stenosis patients was generated, that matched anatomical and demographic characteristics of the clinical population. Using a novel fast-to-evaluate TAVI deployment model, nearly 29,000 simulations were performed across multiple model parameter combinations per patient. Shape and demographic distributions in the in silico trial, remained within the bounds of the clinical study. Among the investigated anatomical parameters, a higher angle between left ventricular outflow tract and ascending aorta was found in patients with significant PLV, in both clinical and virtual cohorts. Additionally, the relationship between PVL and implantation depth appeared highly patient-specific, which is in line with findings in clinical studies. The ability to systematically test multiple TAVI deployments scenarios per patient, which is unfeasible in clinical practice, provides valuable insights for procedure design and optimisation. Overall, the results support the feasibility of implementing large-scale in silico TAVI trials, using the VCG and a fast-to-evaluate model, into the regulatory validation chain.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationModels, CardiovascularTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic Valve StenosisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansFast-to-evaluate modelsIn silico trialsParavalvular leakageTranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID42791401
PMCPMC13615088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.