Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791358›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Three-Dimensional Scanning for Reduction Mammaplasty in Asymmetric Breast Hypertrophy.

Siming Wei, Na Wang, Shuai Qiang, Zhaoxiang Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siming Wei *Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University, No.127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Na Wang *Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University, No.127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Shuai QiangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University, No.127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Zhaoxiang ZhangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Xijing Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University, No.127 Changle West Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China. chaogai263@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsymmetric breast hypertrophy is a common clinical presentation, primarily managed through surgical intervention. Accurate preoperative symmetry assessment is crucial for determining postoperative breast symmetry and aesthetic outcomes. However, current assessments rely heavily on surgeon experience, posing challenges for less experienced practitioners, and conventional measurement techniques fail to accurately capture bilateral breast volume and related parameters. In this study, three-dimensional (3D) scanning enabled rapid and straightforward preoperative assessment of breast morphology. This objective evaluation facilitated the optimization of postoperative breast symmetry.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 25 female patients with asymmetric breast hypertrophy who underwent reduction mammaplasty in our department between February 2023 and February 2025. All patients underwent 3D breast scanning both preoperatively and at the 6-month postoperative follow-up. Bilateral breast volume difference and blinded observer-rated aesthetic scores were then analyzed based on the acquired data. Aesthetic evaluation of postoperative breast morphology was evaluated based on preoperative and postoperative photographs using a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent, 1 = poor). The assessment covered five key dimensions: (1) nipple-areola complex (NAC) position, (2) inframammary fold (IMF) height, (3) breast size, (4) breast shape, and (5) projection.

resultsAll 25 patients underwent successful reduction mammaplasty. Breast volume was assessed via 3D scanning both preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 6.85 ± 1.54 months. The mean preoperative volume asymmetry of 148.32 mL was reduced to 15.32 mL postoperatively, representing a mean reduction of 133.00 mL (95% CI: 102.13, 163.87; p < 0.001). Expressed as a percentage, the volume symmetry improved by a mean of 88.10% (95% CI: 86.03%, 90.16%), which was statistically significant compared to a null hypothesis of 0% improvement (p < 0.001). With the application of the 3D scanning technique, the average observer-rated aesthetic score postoperatively was 4.40 (on a 5-point scale). Postoperative symmetry scores across all five evaluated dimensions demonstrated significant improvement relative to preoperative baseline values (p < 0.001).

conclusionIn this single-surgeon, single-center case series, the implementation of 3D scanning-assisted preoperative planning was correlated with a reduction in breast volume asymmetry and an improvement in observer-rated aesthetic symmetry among patients presenting with asymmetric breast hypertrophy. These findings suggest that 3D scanning may provide objective data to assist less-experienced surgeons in decision-making regarding glandular tissue resection, potentially contributing to improved breast symmetry. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

3D scanningAsymmetric breast hypertrophyBreast symmetryObserver-rated aesthetic scoreReduction mammaplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.