ArticleSpinal cord2026
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of three seated trunk control assessments used during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCohort study.
objectivesTo investigate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Trunk Control Test (TCT) and two Function in Sitting Tests (FIST) for people with a spinal cord injury (SCI; FIST-SCI and Modified-FIST (mFIST)) during inpatient rehabilitation.
settingInpatient Rehabilitation Hospital in Sydney, Australia.
methodsThirty adults with recent (SCI) completed four assessments led by three raters within two weeks to determine inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Validity was determined through known-groups and Spearman Correlation analyses with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Spinal Cord Independence Measure, Maximal Balance Range Test, and SCI-Falls Concern Scale. Six-week follow-up responsiveness assessments and global rating of change scale (GRCS) scores were completed.
resultsNeurological level of injury ranged from C4 to L2 (80% motor-incomplete SCI). Time since injury was 84 days (95% CI:64,105). The TCT and FIST-SCI had excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9). The mFIST had excellent intra-rater (ICC = 0.908) and good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.867). All three tests differentiated between participants who were independent and required assistance with transfers (p < 0.05). All three tests correlated with the BBS (ρ
conclusionsThe TCT, FIST-SCI, and mFIST are reliable and valid seated trunk control tests in SCI early inpatient rehabilitation. Future studies should investigate responsiveness in people with motor-complete SCI.
Identifiers
42791314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.