ArticleNature communications2026
Canopy functional composition as an indicator of bird traits, taxonomy, and vulnerability in tropical Peruvian forests.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tropical forests harbour exceptional biodiversity, yet anthropogenic change is rapidly altering forest composition and structure in ways that shape species' ecological strategies and persistence. While advances in remote sensing now allow detailed characterisation of canopy function, links between forest functional diversity and animal traits remain poorly understood. Here, using linear model selection and variance partitioning, we test whether canopy functional groups (clusters of forest types sharing similar structure, chemistry, and phenology) predict variation in bird community (>1300 species) functional traits, life history traits, vulnerability, and taxonomy across Andean-Amazonian forests in Peru, accounting for a comprehensive baseline of environmental and structural predictors. Distinct forest functional groups are associated with distinct bird traits, levels of anthropogenic impact, and taxonomic assemblages, providing explanatory power beyond traditional abiotic gradients. For example, Southern Amazonian lowlands and Northern Amazonian Swamps contain large-bodied, slow-reproducing, and non-passerine-dominated assemblages. In contrast, Amazonian floodplains support small, fast-reproducing, and passerine-dominated assemblages. These findings underscore the potential of integrating habitat functionality with species traits to map critical resource landscapes and revolutionise conservation prioritisation strategies such as gap analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.