Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42791028›Full record

ArticleRMD open2026

Clinical and immunological outcomes of rituximab-based, mycophenolate mofetil-based and cyclophosphamide-based treatment strategies for systemic lupus erythematosus with active kidney involvement from LOOPS registry.

Masanobu Ueno, Ippei Miyagawa, Hiroaki Tanaka, Satoshi Kubo, Yusuke Miyazaki, Yasuyuki Todoroki, Yuya Fujita, Ryuichiro Kanda, Hidenori Sakai, Katsuhide Kusaka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Masanobu UenoThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0212-172X
Ippei MiyagawaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Hiroaki TanakaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-1317
Satoshi KuboThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-9263
Yusuke MiyazakiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5692-3881
Yasuyuki TodorokiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yuya FujitaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4163-9356
Ryuichiro KandaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8247-6595
Hidenori SakaiThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6220-1233
Katsuhide KusakaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-0334
Shingo NakayamadaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2209-8454
Yoshiya TanakaThe First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan tanaka@med.uoeh-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-7139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the clinical outcomes and explore longitudinal peripheral blood immunophenotypic changes associated with rituximab (RTX)-based, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY)-based treatment strategies for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and active lupus nephritis.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed patients with SLE and active lupus nephritis enrolled in the LOOPS registry who received single-agent induction therapy with RTX, MMF or IVCY in addition to glucocorticoids (GCs). The co-primary endpoints were the achievement rates of complete renal response (CRR) and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.7 g/gCr at week 52. Secondary endpoints included renal function, proteinuria, disease activity, relapse rate and safety. Peripheral blood immune cell subsets were assessed by multicolour flow cytometry before and after treatment.

resultsAt week 52, no significant differences were observed in CRR rates or improvement in proteinuria among the groups. Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate, disease activity measures and concomitant GC dose also did not differ significantly. Exploratory within-strategy analyses showed reduced B-cell subset proportions with RTX and broader reductions, including in activated T cells, with MMF and IVCY. However, treatment strategy-by-time interaction was not significant, providing no evidence of between-strategy differences in longitudinal changes.

conclusionThe 52-week clinical effectiveness of the RTX-based, MMF-based and IVCY-based strategies for active lupus nephritis did not differ significantly. Different within-strategy immunophenotypic patterns were observed, but between-strategy differences were not confirmed. Comprehensive immunophenotyping may help characterise immune dynamics and support future response stratification and precision medicine for lupus nephritis.

Indexed as

CyclophosphamideLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisMycophenolic AcidRituximabAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidRituximabLupus NephritisRituximabSystemic Lupus Erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID42791028
PMCPMC13630072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.