ArticleRMD open2026
Comparative analysis of instruments measuring peripheral arthritis activity in Spondyloarthritis: a measurement properties study in 13 RCTs.
Article in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUsing randomised controlled trial (RCT) data, this study evaluated the measurement properties of selected instruments to assess peripheral arthritis in axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis (axSpA/pSpA) and to inform selection of the best-performing instrument.
methodsEligible studies were RCTs in axSpA or pSpA with individual patient data available to calculate Patient Global Assessment (PGA), swollen/tender joint counts (44 or 66/68 joints), C reactive protein, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis/Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis with 44 joint count (DAPSA44) and 44-joint Disease Activity Score at baseline and timing of primary endpoint. In axSpA, analyses were restricted to patients with peripheral arthritis at baseline. Measurement properties assessed included construct validity, test-retest reliability, longitudinal construct validity, trial discrimination and thresholds of meaning. Risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated and evidence was synthesised using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-based GREEN/AMBER/RED ratings (low/uncertain/high RoB and good/adequate/poor performance, respectively).
results13 RCTs were included (10 axSpA and 3 pSpA). In axSpA trials, 25-51% of patients had peripheral arthritis at baseline (median swollen joint count of 44 joints (SJC44) across studies: 2-3); in pSpA trials, median SJC44 ranged 2-5. In axSpA, construct validity and thresholds of meaning were rated AMBER/GREEN for all instruments, while test-retest reliability was RED only for PGA. Responsiveness was consistently GREEN. Clinical trial discrimination was RED for single-item instruments but consistently GREEN for composite scores. In pSpA, most instruments showed AMBER/GREEN performance, although SJC44 demonstrated RED discrimination.
conclusionsThis study provides the first comprehensive, trial-based evaluation of measurement properties for instruments assessing peripheral arthritis activity in axSpA and pSpA. Composite scores, such as BASDAI, ASDAS and DAPSA44, generally demonstrated more robust performance than single-item instruments, expanding the evidence base for the final instrument-selection phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.