Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42790911›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Impact of perinatal anxiety on healthcare utilisation: a matched cohort study using electronic health records in the UK.

Dahai Yu, James Bailey, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Holly C Smith, Charlotte Archer, Jonathan Evans, Tamsin Fisher, David Kessler, Tom Kingstone, Irene Petersen and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Dahai YuPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK d.yu@keele.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8449-7725
James BaileyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9722-9981
Holly C SmithDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6805-680X
Charlotte ArcherPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4762-2950
Jonathan EvansPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Tamsin FisherPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
David KesslerPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Tom KingstonePrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-2303
Irene PetersenDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Janine ProctorJust Family Community Interest Company (CIC), Stoke on Trent, UK.
Noureen ShivjiPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Victoria SilverwoodPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Amy SprucePrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Katrina TurnerPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-2918
Pensée WuPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Miliça Blagojevic-BucknallPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Kelvin P JordanPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine differences in healthcare utilisation patterns among women with perinatal anxiety (PNA) compared with women with anxiety but not pregnant and women with pregnancy but no anxiety.

designA retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum (1998-2020), linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, the Index of Multiple Deprivation, Mother Baby Link and Pregnancy Register in England.

settingPrimary care records from general practices contributing to CPRD in England.

participantsThe study included records for 103 287 women with PNA and two matched comparison cohorts: 413 148 women with anxiety but no pregnancy (anxiety-only cohort) and 413 148 women with pregnancy but no anxiety (pregnancy-only cohort). Women were matched 1:4 on age, general practice and index year. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare utilisation was assessed by primary care clinical encounters (recorded primary care consultations/contacts, including general practitioner (GP) and other primary care clinician contacts), prescriptions, referrals and hospitalisations. Outcomes were measured in five time periods: (1) pregnancy to delivery, (2) delivery to 72 days post partum, (3) 73 days to 6 months post partum, (4) 7-12 months post partum and (5) 13-24 months post partum. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and absolute risk differences were calculated using conditional Poisson regression models adjusting for sociodemographic and comorbidity-related confounders.

resultsWomen with PNA consistently had higher rates of healthcare utilisation across all time periods. Compared with the anxiety-only cohort, the adjusted IRR for primary care encounters was 1.742 (95% CI 1.739 to 1.746) during pregnancy and 2.288 (95% CI 2.283 to 2.293) in the 72 days postpartum period. compared with the pregnancy-only cohort, the adjusted IRR for primary care encounters was 1.653 (95% CI 1.651 to 1.655) during pregnancy and 2.319 (95% CI 2.314 to 2.324) in the 72 days postpartum period. Prescriptions and referrals followed similar patterns, while increased hospitalisation rates postdelivery were not observed in the PNA cohort.

conclusionsWomen with PNA exhibited higher healthcare utilisation up to 24 months after delivery, particularly in the period immediately after delivery. These findings highlight the necessity for early identification and sustained support for this population.

Indexed as

AnxietyPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancy ComplicationsAdultElectronic Health RecordsEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHumansPregnancyPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomYoung AdultAnxiety disordersDepression & mood disordersElectronic Health RecordsHospitalizationOBSTETRICSPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID42790911
PMCPMC13629954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.