ArticleBMJ open2026
Trainee experiences of a qualitative research training programme for young women in Kenya: a mixed methods study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore and understand trainee experiences of a pilot qualitative research training programme for young women in Kisumu, Kenya.
designMixed-methods study, including knowledge surveys disseminated at three time points (baseline, midline, endline), one-on-one qualitative interviews conducted at two time points (baseline, endline) and an open-ended follow-up survey 16 months after the training concluded.
settingThe Future of Sexual and Reproductive Health Research Kenya (FOR-Kenya) programme was implemented in Kisumu, Kenya. TRAINEES: 10 young women (20-25 years old), including six undergraduate students at Maseno University and four community members in Kisumu, Kenya. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed trainees' knowledge of qualitative research, confidence in qualitative research skills and interest in a qualitative research career.
resultsTrainees' average knowledge score rose from 69% at baseline to 78% at endline, alongside increases in confidence in conducting, evaluating and identifying key elements of qualitative research and in interest in a qualitative research career (80%-100%). Interviews highlighted hands-on fieldwork, close mentorship and peer support as central to these gains alongside challenges around time for data analysis. At the 16-month follow-up, 6 of 10 trainees reported using FOR-Kenya skills to secure further research opportunities.
conclusionStructured, hands-on qualitative research training delivered before graduate school appears to build research capacity and career interest among young women from university and community backgrounds. Programmes adapting this model should plan for adequate time, funding and institutional lead time to support trainees' full engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.